We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience. By continuing to use this site without changing your settings you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our site and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Close Cookie Bar

What have we been up to

NEWS & VIEWS

Donec varius pellentesque metus, at vehicula magna egestas quis. Sed purus ipsum, vehicula id libero laoreet, posuere ornare urna. In eu nulla leo. Nullam pellentesque dolor nec scelerisque consequat.

Update: BPF’s Government consultation on BEPS

image
20 th June 2016
Share on Linkedin
+ -
If you thought this page is useful to your friend, use this form to send.
Friend Email
Enter your message

The future for UK wholly owned groups is a little more positive following BPF’s meeting last week with the HMRC and Treasury to discuss industry concerns regarding the implementation of BEPS or Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Insights achieved as a result of those conversations are broken down below. 

We speculated in our April update, UK only property groups would not be too affected by the OECD 30% EBITDA fixed ratio rule. So far that’s looking to be an accurate prediction. Government representatives indicated that they are open to finding solutions to the issues faced by wholly owned UK groups should they arise during the implementation of the group ratio rule. The BPF continue to work through details on this - for example, whether use-tax or accounting figures are to be used in the group ratio calculation.

Multinational groups on the other hand, still face a heightened level of uncertainty with initial indications being that Government is less worried about the fallout of that same group calculation on them. It also appears as though representatives remain unconvinced that third party debt secured against an asset necessarily represents a low risk of tax avoidance.

As previously indicated, those groups with varying degrees of yield and leverage will need to continue to pay close attention to how BEPS evolves over the coming months ahead of the April 2017 implementation deadline. 

Consultation between BPF, HMRC and Treasury also addressed how joint ventures would be assessed under the changes as well as the potential for grandfathering however, detail around these issues is still not clear.

Once again, Rachel Kelly at the BPF welcomes examples from the industry of developments that may be put at risk by the proposed changes. Residential and non-London developments would resonate particularly well with Government officials.  Rachel can be contacted directly at rkelly@bpf.org.uk for a more in-depth summary on the BPF’s lobbying efforts to date. 

ARCHIVED

RELATED ARTICLEs

Is there an upside for investee companies of a weakening pound

image
12thApril 2016

Can investee companies with foreign currency receivables simultaneously benefit from a weaker pound and rising...

read more

Posting cash collateral: EMIR derivative regulation changes

image
19thOctober 2016

This year we have seen the finalisation of a number of regulations and technical standards surrounding the clearing and...

read more

How can we help you

Have you got a question about how you hedge your financial risks, or structure and arrange your debt?

Find out how we can help you by contacting us today.

 

contact us

Stay Connected

Would you like news and views on local and global financial markets?

Sign up today to receive news straight to your inbox.

By providing your email address you agree to receive marketing emails from JCRA. We won’t ever spam you. See our privacy policy.

CLOSE

SIGN UP FOR NEWS

Subscribe